capad.fyi · hero revamp · reference sheet
Each one below is a working mockup at real proportions, not a description. Desktop is a 16:10 frame, phone is 390×780. Your five cut-out photos are composited in at actual relative scale, and each frame sizes its own type against its own width, so the phone column is a real phone composition rather than the desktop one squeezed.
The diagnosis driving all four: the current hero has five elements competing at the same optical weight in a centred column — a 220px wordmark, an eyebrow pill, a signature, a paragraph, and a CTA. Five focal points is zero. The tagline, which is the only genuinely good sentence on the page, is the quietest thing in it. Every direction below changes what carries the emphasis.
Keep the wordmark as the monument. Put a person through it. The brand stays loud for search and recognition, but the logo lockup stops being an anonymous object because a human cuts across the baseline.
desktop
I build the tools that shouldn’t need to exist. The ones that do frustrated me into building better ones.
phone
I build the tools that shouldn’t need to exist.
Aadarsh Upadhyay See the work| Cost to build | Low. One <img>, existing CSS variables, no new dependency. |
|---|---|
| Runtime JS | None added. The intro cascade already exists. |
| Keeps from today | Wordmark, eyebrow, availability, shipping strip, CTA, full ambient + grain treatment. |
| Risk | The figure overlaps the wordmark by design, so on a 360px phone the brand name is partly occluded. Needs a legibility check at 360. |
| Mobile | Real second composition, not a squeeze. Figure is 34% height and the type sits clear above it. |
Delete almost everything. One large photograph, one short claim, one button, tiny type for everything else. The image does the emotional work and the type only carries the claim. Borrowed from Victor Furuya, who holds up well on mobile.
desktop
I build the tools that shouldn’t need to exist. The ones that do frustrated me into building better ones: fast, free, and yours to keep.
phone
I build the tools that shouldn’t need to exist.
See the work| Cost to build | Low. Grid plus one image. Simplest of the four. |
|---|---|
| Runtime JS | None. Could drop several of the hero's reveal timers. |
| Keeps from today | Eyebrow, CTA, shipping strip, ambient, grain. Drops the 220px wordmark — biggest strategic change of the four. |
| Risk | Loses the brand monument. On a portfolio whose name is also the product, that is a real cost. Search impact is mitigated if the wordmark still appears at smaller size and in the title tag. |
| Mobile | Verified pattern on the reference; stacks to photo-over-text cleanly. |
Invert the hierarchy completely. The name becomes a small mono label and the sentence becomes the monument, set enormous and filling the width. You are small, right, signing it. Borrowed from Rauno Freiberg, who does this on a flat background with zero blur.
desktop
phone
| Cost to build | Lowest of the four. Type and one small image. Effectively zero new CSS. |
|---|---|
| Runtime JS | None. The most likely to be faster than today. |
| Keeps from today | Every element survives. Nothing is deleted — the name and eyebrow just shrink into the top row. Shipped strip, CTA, availability all intact. |
| Risk | The statement has to be tuned per breakpoint. Desktop and phone use different photos, which is a deliberate art-direction call, not an oversight. |
| Mobile | Type-driven, so it reflows natively. No fixed-width risk. |
A physical object: graph-paper card, prints pinned to it at slight rotations with tape, accession labels underneath like a museum record. One accent ink. Three photos per view. Maximum personality, maximum risk.
desktop
phone
| Cost to build | Medium. Per-breakpoint pin positions, and the card needs its own stacking context. |
|---|---|
| Runtime JS | None strictly required. A scroll-parallax on the pins would be the temptation — resist it, or it re-creates the frame budget you are already fighting. |
| Keeps from today | Keeps ambient, grain, CTA, the name. Loses the wordmark entirely and the shipping strip. The eyebrow survives only as an accession label. |
| Risk | Highest. The reference site this borrows from is visibly broken on mobile and asks visitors to use a desktop. |
| Mobile | Needs its own composition, shown here, but it is the one to test hardest on a real phone. |